Cases 1 - 10 of 1,693
Johnson v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04531
Plaintiff:
Norman Johnson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Dr. Marlene Henze, Bryan T Chua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hooker et al
as 2:2024cv02120
Plaintiff:
Artez L Johnson
Defendant:
. Hooker and Macon County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Howard et al
as 3:2024cv03131
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Johnson
Defendant:
. Howard, . Thomas, . Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Larry et al
as 1:2024cv04200
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Catherine Larry and Lisa Kolar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Johnson v. Sergeant Allman, et al
as 24-1821
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT ALLMAN and JOHN DOE, 3
WALTERS v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
HARRINGTON, MARION COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPT., KERRY FORRESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Paulsen et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Heather Paulsen, Steven Johnson, Bradley Everson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, BUTLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Gloudemans et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Captain Gloudemans, B Eversor, Mr Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Briggs et al
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Darcell Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Director Briggs, Warden Jason Benzel, CO B Kapolnek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
