Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jamal Johnson v. Warden Williams, et al
as 23-3380
Plaintiff:
JAMAL JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAMS, Warden of Hill CC, OFFICER LITTLE and OFFICER MILLER
Antwan Carruthers v. St. Joseph County Jail, et al
as 23-2001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. JOSEPH COUNTY JAIL, OFFICER WOODY, Deputy and OFFICER MILLER, Deputy
Shelton v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv04051
Plaintiff:
Jason Shelton
Defendant:
Tom J. Dart and Officer Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Duncan v. Thomas Spiller, et al
as 15-1562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM SPILLER, OFFICER MILLER, OFFICER WRAGLER and others
Sykes v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Eddie Sykes
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Dr Fahim, Dr Nwaobasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortega v. Kane County Adult Justice Center et al
as 1:2013cv01309
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega
Defendant:
Kane County Adult Justice Center and Officer Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKER v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Defendant:
OFFICER BALLARD, JULIE BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BOOKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv00771
Defendant:
OFFICER BASINGER, J. BEIGHLEY, OFFICER BETTS and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bowman v. Miller et al
as 1:2011cv06392
Plaintiff:
Kendell Bowman
Defendant:
Officer Miller, Supt John Doe and Sgt John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Perez et al
as 1:2008cv04347
Plaintiff:
David A. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Officer Miller, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
