Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Warner v. Kettelkamp et al
as 3:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Bobby Warner
Defendant:
Bruce Kettelkamp, Anthony Grootens, Cecil Polley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris Pegues v. Karl Hoffman, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant:
KARL HOFFMAN, Doctor, LYNN DOBBERT and CANDACE WARNER
Warner v. Racine County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Kyle Warner
Defendant:
Racine County Jail, Racine County Jail Medical Staff and Racine County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ademeko Maclin-Carney v. Ashley Warner, et al
as 24-1110
Plaintiff:
ADEMEKO MACLIN-CARNEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY WARNER, MICHELLE STINE, WENDY DIERECKS and others
Hughes v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
. Maloney, . Renfro, . Geotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin-Carney v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Ademeko Maclin-Carney
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, . Renfro, Macon County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARNER v. HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DARNELL WARNER
Defendant:
HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Breyley, III v. Larry Fuchs, et al
as 22-1663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES K. BREYLEY, III
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY FUCHS, DON STRAHOTA, Warden, CANDACE WARNER and others
MYNATT v. REAGLE, et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
