Cases 151 - 160 of 833,276
Flores v. Doe Agent 1
as 3:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Anthony Flores
Defendant:
Doe Agent 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Rymal v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Chad Rymal
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co v. High End Development, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01909
Plaintiff:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
Defendant:
High End Development, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Izquierdo v. Henne et al
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Pablo Izquierdo
Defendant:
T. Henne and Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jack Benjamin Hessiani v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01034
Petitioner:
Jack Benjamin Hessiani
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Berens et al v. Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation
as 3:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Ronda Berens, Dalton Kelly, Dilara Baunach and others
Defendant:
Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
