Cases 31 - 40 of 87
SURZYCKI v. ARNETTE
as 1:2020cv02621
Defendant:
ALYSSA ARNETTE
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and ALEXSANDRA SURZYCKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JANE DOE v. PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC
as 1:2020cv02550
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURZYCKI v. LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2020cv02403
Defendant:
LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and ALEKSANDRA SURZYCKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Bradley University
as 1:2020cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Bradley University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Las Vegas Pool Hall Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Roberto Delgadillo, Adalberto Fuentes and others
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gotschall v. Exelon Generation Company, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05852
Defendant:
Gregory Stopka, John Does I-X, White Associations I-X and others
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Gotschall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Wolcott Diversey Condominium Association et al
as 1:2019cv03856
Defendant:
Jacob Strohman, Cagan Management Group, Inc., Julie Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dorna TJ, LLC et al v. Barnhardt et al
as 1:2019cv03404
Defendant:
LMLC Franchising, LLC, LMLC Management, LLC, Mr. Todd Barnhardt and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Dorna TJ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2019cv01787
Defendant:
JANE DOE and NEIL C. DAVIS
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Doe v. St Joseph Community Hospital of West Bend Inc
as 2:2019cv05000
Consolidated Defendant:
J D Smith
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
St Joseph Community Hospital of West Bend Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
