Other Statutes Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 575
BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03852
Plaintiff: BALDWIN KRYSTYN SHERMAN PARTNERS, LLC and THE BALDWIN GROUP COLLEAGUE, INC.
Defendant: Michael Jones
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff: J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant: Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Keith Jones
as 24-1409
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KEITH J. JONES, also known as KEYBO
Raymond Jones v. Cheryl Eplett
as 24-1398
Applicant: RAYMOND JONES
Respondent: CHERYL EPLETT, Warden
USA v. Calvin Jones
as 24-1295
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CALVIN JONES
Solomon Jones v. Colin Bruce
as 24-1092
Petitioner: SOLOMON A. JONES
Respondent: COLIN S. BRUCE
Interested Party: KANKAKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KANKAKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF KANKAKEE, ILLINOIS and others
Carina Ventures LLC v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16948
Defendant: Cargill Protein North America, Agri Stats Inc., Express Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Carina Ventures LLC, Burford Capital Ltd., Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jones v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv03355
Petitioner: Jeffrey T. Jones
Respondent: Lynea Turner, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Erwin v. Veradigm Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16205
Plaintiff: John M. Erwin
Defendant: Veradigm Inc., Paul M. Black, Richard J. Poulton and others
REHFELDT v. GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv01786
Plaintiff: SARAH REHFELDT
Defendant: GREEN ARROW SOLUTIONS doing business as GREEN ARROW LOANS, INTEGRA FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, NEVADA IMPACT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?