Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv00818
In Re:
In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Lee, Keaira Gamble, Jenny Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith, L'Oreal USA, Inc, Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniels v. Santos et al
as 1:2022cv06571
Plaintiff:
Tamara C Daniels
Defendant:
Robert L Santos, Marilyn A Sanders, Willie Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
