Cases 61 - 70 of 1,674
Chibber v. Raper
as 3:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
Bakshy A Chibber
Defendant:
Mathew Raper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILDER v. KINZIE
as 1:2021cv02850
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WILDER
Defendant:
SHERRI KINZIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. ROYALTY et al
as 1:2021cv02654
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. JOHNSON and TERRY C. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DON ROYALTY, REGINA ROYALTY, GREG WALTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILDER v. HEGE
as 1:2021cv02851
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WILDER
Defendant:
GREG HEGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Risner et al v. Hamilton Helicopter Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
William Risner and Crystal Risner
Defendant:
Hamilton Helicopter Inc and Kurt Homkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lake Michigan Yachting Association et al v. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., formerly known as Arcelormittal USA LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., formerly known as Arcelormittal USA LLC, Cleveland-Cliffs Burns Harbor, LLC, formerly known as Arcelormittal Burns Harbor, Arcelormittal USA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lake Michigan Yachting Association, Portage Port Authority, KLM Dunes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIRDLER v. SHELBY COUNTY AUDITOR et al
as 1:2021cv02415
Plaintiff:
TONY O. GIRDLER
Defendant:
SHELBY COUNTY AUDITOR, SHELBY COUNTY TREASURE, RALPH GIRDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Brown v. WellPet LLC
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
WellPet LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP v. LEHMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LP
Defendant:
William L Lehman, Rebecca A Lehman, WILLIAM L. LEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
NGUYEN v. DAISY NAIL PRODUCTS, INC., et al
as 1:2021cv01430
Defendant:
Daisy Nail Products, Inc. and Nail Maxx Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tom S. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
