Cases 111 - 120 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
SCOTT v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2016cv00374
Defendant:
JEROME ADAMS, MARY KELTNER and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE G. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bock v. Auburn Indiana City of et al
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Adam Bock
Defendant:
Auburn Indiana City of , Justin James , Kitrush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOME CARE PROVIDERS, INC. et al v. HEMMELGARN et al
as 1:2016cv00303
Defendant:
JEROME M. ADAMS, SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, KELLY HEMMELGARN and others
Plaintiff:
DEV A. BRAR, HOME CARE PROVIDERS, INC., NIGHTINGALE HOME HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lash v. Garrett City of et al
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert Lash
Defendant:
Garrett City of, Keith Hefner, Adam Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thibideau et al
as 3:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Leslie Adam Johnson
Defendant:
Greg Thibideau, Gail Thibideau and Jacob Thibideau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PASTORE v. ZELLERS et al
as 1:2015cv00892
Defendant:
NATHANIEL B. BIDDLE, ADAM DEVENPORT, DUSTIN DICKSON and others
Plaintiff:
LOUIS R. PASTORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
