Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Fisher v. Incorprupt Parties
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fisher
Defendant:
Incorprupt Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. TOWN OF CORYDON et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
MAXINE F. BROWN
Defendant:
TOWN OF CORYDON, PAUL HAMANN, HOPE SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. Rossi et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Francis Edward Fisher
Defendant:
David Rossi and John Guy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. Guy et al
as 4:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Francis Edward Fisher
Defendant:
John Guy and David Rossi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rezny et al v. Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions et al
as 2:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Earl Rezny, ACRDGroup LLC and American Community ReDevelopment Group LLC
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, Leslie Van Buskirk, Mark Dorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEFT Outdoor, LLC v. City of Fishers, Indiana, et al
as 22-2599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEFT OUTDOOR, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FISHERS, INDIANA and BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, City of Fishers, Indiana
Fisher v. Rossi et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Francis Edward Fisher
Defendant:
David Rossi and John Guy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fisher v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04574
Plaintiff:
Christine Fisher
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
