Cases 11 - 20 of 1,134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. State of Illinois, et al.
as 1:2024cv03168
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Froedert Hospital
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jones
Defendant:
Froedert Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
