Cases 11 - 20 of 20
GODFREY et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 1:2015cv00138
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GODFREY, CURTIS GODFREY, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Marshall et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2011cv00332
Plaintiff:
J John Marshall and Kimberly Wiley
Estate_plaintiff:
Marjorie Marshall
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , Ameriprise Bank, Fidelity National Field Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PACE v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. CHASE BANK
as 1:2011cv00422
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. CHASE BANK
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. PACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SELBURG et al v. CHASE BANK et al
as 1:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WAYNE SELBURG, JR. and MICHAEL MAURER
Defendant:
CHASE BANK, CHARLES BANTZ, JANE SPENCER CRANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYERS v. ECKARD et al
as 1:2008cv01003
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. MYERS
Defendant:
JOHN ECKARD, DOUGLAS KLITZKE, FRANK ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 2:2007cv00221
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brown
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
