Cases 11 - 20 of 55
INGALLS v. HANSON et al
as 2:2019cv00565
Defendant:
PETER FOLEY, MATTHEW HANSON and GREGORY PACHMAYR
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. INGALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Boudreau et al
as 1:2019cv07286
Defendant:
James Brennan, Dan McWeeny, William Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04379
Plaintiff:
Raul Robles
Defendant:
City of Chicago , David Salgado, Xavier Elizondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv03193
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Adams and Jermany Adams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Joseph Foley (Star #3711), Saltijeral (Star #14972) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00998
Plaintiff:
Nevest Coleman
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, John Halloran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton v. Foley et al
as 1:2017cv08696
Plaintiff:
Derrell Fulton
Defendant:
William Foley, Michael Clancy, John Halloran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Destiny Hoffman, et al v. Susan Knoebel, et al
as 17-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESTINY HOFFMAN, On behalf of themselves and on behalf of others similarly situated, NATHAN CLIFFORD, JOSHUA FOLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN KNOEBEL, JEREMY SNELLING, JOSH SEYBOLD and others
Sato v. Santiago et al
as 1:2017cv05399
Plaintiff:
Mark Sato
Defendant:
Beatriz Santiago, Anthony Casale, Victor Puscas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Wisz et al
as 1:2017cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jawone Brooks
Defendant:
Donald E. Wisz, Matthew J. Pasko, Joseph B. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOKE v. LUX et al
as 1:2017cv00589
IMPD:
Z. CARVER, S. FOLEY, W. HALE and others
Plaintiff:
JAHRAD L. COOKE
Defendant:
MATTHEW KUBACKI and MICHAEL LUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
