Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stewart, Timothy v. Holmes, Jessica et al
as 3:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Jessica Holmes, Sarah Liedholdt, Police Officer Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rittenhouse et al v. Holliday et al
as 1:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rittenhouse and Carolyn Rittenhouse
Defendant:
Scott Holliday, Wells County, Indiana, Karen Thompson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Edward Beck
Estate Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Rittenhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHEN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv01925
Respondent:
TERRY STIGDON, AMANDA MYERS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE LING CHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MYERS v. EVERETT et al
as 1:2021cv01786
Defendant:
TOWN OF SUMMITVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THOMAS EVERETT, SHAWN MCGUIRE and others
Plaintiff:
Monte Myers
MERCADO v. MYERS
as 1:2021cv01263
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO MERCADO
Defendant:
MATT MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellegood et al v. Greyhound Lines Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00391
Plaintiff:
Dakin Ellegood and Lindsey Myers
Defendant:
Jewell Gilliam-West and Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BARBER et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA CAUDILL, NATHAN PARTON, JOHN JAY BOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWAILS v. MYERS et al
as 1:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Edward Rodriguez, Brad Shaw, Dana Karr and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Sankey, Richard L Swails, Richard W Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
