Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Reed v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
David Reed
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Corizon LLC , Andrew Liaw MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WADSACK v. DAYDREAMS HOSPITALITY, LLC
as 4:2016cv00011
Defendant:
DAYDREAMS HOSPITALITY, LLC
Plaintiff:
ALICE WADSACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Zimmerman et al
as 2:2015cv01513
Plaintiff:
Adam Nicholas Young
Defendant:
Cheryl Zimmerman, Diana Rhyme, Robert Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dawain Bell, et al v. City of Chicago
as 15-2833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWAIN BELL and ALICE SPINKS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Bell et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2014cv07382
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Dawain Bell and Alice Spinks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOENIGMAN et al v. PENCE et al.
as 1:2014cv01426
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALLEY, MICHAEL PENCE and GREGORY ZOELLER
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN R. BRETZ, KENDREL L COOPER, JUAN F. DELEON GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. et al v. Ryan Companies US, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03197
Plaintiff:
National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. , H.O.P.E. Inc. and Open Communities
Defendant:
Ryan Companies US, Inc., Ryan A + E, Inc., James N. Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
