Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Garza v. Cervantes et al
as 1:2014cv00923
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Garza
Defendant:
Martha Cervantes, George Cardenas, Senator Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guzman v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Guzman
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Christopher Barajas and Rudolph Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montejano, Sr. v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv07313
Plaintiff:
Roberto Montejano, Sr.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sean Campbell and Rudolph Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas v. Chicago Police Officers et al
as 1:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Jwuan Thomas
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officers, Rebecca Garcia, Michael Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hull v. Unknown Chicago Police Officers
as 1:2013cv01563
Plaintiff:
Tarnche Hull
Defendant:
City of Chicago, R. Brown, A. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Wautoma Area School District
as 1:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carlos O Garza
Defendant:
Wautoma Area School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GARZA v. GORMAN et al
as 1:2012cv00618
Defendant:
DARREN R. COVINGTON, SEAN GORMAN, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
ERNESTINE (MOORE) GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Love EL v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2012cv02730
Plaintiff:
Sheik L Love EL
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation , P.J. Habiak, D. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
