Cases 31 - 40 of 790
Davis v. City of South Milwaukee et al
as 2:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Ontario Davis
Defendant:
City of South Milwaukee and Steve D Streicher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Matsoukas et al
as 1:2023cv14508
Plaintiff:
Marco Henderson
Defendant:
Lake County, Illinois, Renatta Matsoukas, Alex Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAVIS II v. IFGB, LLC d/b/a FIVE GUY'S BURGERS AND FRIES et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Richard Davis II and RICHARD DAVIS, II
Defendant:
IFGB, LLC, Miracle Ricketts, Shawn Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. TESSMANN et al
as 1:2023cv05945
Plaintiff:
Herman Williams
Defendant:
LUCIAN TESSMANN, Charles Fagan, Gregory Garofalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kiontae Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIONTAE MACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PAUL MADERER, Detective, Star No. 21246, DAVID ROBERTS, Detective, Star No. 20764 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
