Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Prymer v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv50340
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Prymer
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC and JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Marshall et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2011cv00332
Plaintiff:
J John Marshall and Kimberly Wiley
Estate_plaintiff:
Marjorie Marshall
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank , Ameriprise Bank, Fidelity National Field Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PACE v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. CHASE BANK
as 1:2011cv00422
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. CHASE BANK
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. PACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Murray et al v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 3:2010cv03097
Plaintiff:
Sharon Murray and Anthony Murray
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, Rosetta LNU, Maria Nisbett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christian v. Walgreen Company et al
as 1:2010cv02489
Plaintiff:
Alfreda Christian
Defendant:
Walgreen Company, Nancy Gargula, Yvette Kleven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Allen v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 1:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Janice Allen
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, EEOC, Illinois Department of Human Rights and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
