Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Poole v. Saddler et al
as 1:2013cv04984
Plaintiff:
David Poole
Defendant:
Michelle R.B. Saddler, S. A. Godinez, Stephen L. Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kingdom Authority International Ministries, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv50240
Plaintiff:
Kingdom Authority International Ministries, Inc., House of Grace Christian Learning Center, Shelia Brown and others
Defendant:
The City Of Rockford, Stanton North, Oda Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
barmore v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2009cv50236
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, oda poole and Stan North
Plaintiff:
maryann barmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Drozek v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2009cv50177
Plaintiff:
Anthony Drozek, Anthony Drozek, Anthony Drozek and others
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Watton, Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Landreth v. Leigh et al
as 1:2008cv01654
Plaintiff:
John Colt Landreth
Defendant:
Keith R Leigh, Pool, Leigh & Kopke, P.C., Robert M Eschbach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buford v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00214
Plaintiff:
Sherry Walker Buford
Defendant:
City of Chicago, T. Whitehead, D. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUNTON v. IPS et al
as 1:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH BUNTON
Defendant:
IPS, LOIS CLARK, HONEY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
