Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Riley v. Saavedra et al
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
William Riley
Defendant:
Lake County , E Saavedra , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2017cv05199
Plaintiff:
Saquan Riley
Defendant:
Officer Hernandez, Officer Mekshi, Officer Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angela Riley v. City of Kokomo, Indiana, Housi
as 17-1701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KOKOMO, Indiana, Housing Authority
James DeMilio v. P.O. Bradley Riley et al
as 1:2016cv11724
Plaintiff:
James DeMilio
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
P.O. Bradley Riley and Village of Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrell v. Kramer et al
as 1:2016cv09372
Plaintiff:
Louis D. Burrell
Defendant:
Michael Kramer, Antonio Riley and Brian G Hiatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Tommy Love v. P.O. Riley #10298 et al
as 1:2016cv05241
Plaintiff:
Tommy Love
Defendant:
P.O. Riley #10298, P.O. Renault #19250 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv01963
Plaintiff:
Daniel Andersen
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, James Bednarkiewicz, Richard Bedran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Linda Construction Inc., et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv08714
Plaintiff:
Linda Construction Inc. , Linda McGee and Jesse McGee
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Department of Procurement Services , Republic Services Inc. , Allied Waste Transportation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
