Cases 41 - 50 of 1,204
Darnell Moon v. D. Scott Dodrill, et al
as 23-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL W. MOON
Defendant / Appellee:
D. SCOTT DODRILL, BLAKE DAVIS, formerly listed as BRIAN K. DAVIS, LESLIE SMITH and others
NESBITT v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
SIR NIKOLAAS Q. NESBITT
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, RICHARD LAUISH, K. WHEAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collier v. Collier
as 3:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Brian S Collier
Defendant:
Amy K Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Huggins, et al v. ABK Tracking, Incorporated, et al
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM HUGGINS and HOBERT K. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
ABK TRACKING, INCORPORATED, ABK ALARMS, INCORPORATED, ABK REMOTE DRUG TESTING, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Latosha Bowlin, et al v. Board of Directors, Judah Christian School, et al
as 23-3049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATOSHA BOWLIN, NICOLE POTTHAST and AMANDA K. HUMPHREYS
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, JUDAH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, BOARD OF EDUCATION, STAUNTON, CUSD #6 and BOARD OF EDUCATION, NORTH MAC, CUSD #34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
