Cases 51 - 60 of 278
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Trew et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Alexander
Defendant:
Mary S Trew, Mark Joseph Lopez, The Law Offices of Van A. Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MILLS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2021cv00088
Defendant:
BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv02393
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER ROMAN, UNNAMED CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE OFFICERS, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Patsy Pierce and Alexander Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Reillo et al
as 2:2021cv00142
Defendant:
P.O. Alexander Reillo, City of Munster, Alexander Reillo and others
Plaintiff:
Damonte Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda et al v. Roman et al
as 1:2021cv02103
Defendant:
James Evangelista, Connor Purdy, Rodolfo Elizondo and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Miranda and Antonio Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
