Civil Rights Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1270
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01679
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Grasty v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv09141
Plaintiff: Diahann Grasty
Defendant: Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc. and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nordstrom v. A&E Integrated Health,Inc et al
as 1:2012cv08737
Plaintiff: Jennifer Nordstrom
Defendant: A&E Integrated Health,Inc , Michael Bozzone and James Nakis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv03250
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Antron Cannon, et al v. Panasonic Corporation of North, et al
as 12-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTRON CANNON, MARCOS RAMOS and CHARLTON HORICE
Defendant - Appellee: PANASONIC, QPS COMPANIES, INCORPORATED and UTI INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INCORPORATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?