Cases 51 - 60 of 98
Tejeda, Jeltreta v. Doe (1), John et al
as 3:2015cv00432
Plaintiff:
Jeltreta Tejeda
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carden v. Boyd et al
as 3:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Yancy Carden
Defendant:
James Boyd , Village of Washington Park IL , John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NICHOLS v. MUSSELMAN et al
as 1:2015cv00785
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (1), JOHN DOE (2), INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
317) 327-3968 (fax:
MATT MUSSELMAN
Plaintiff:
RYAN NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pulera v. Sarzant et al
as 2:2015cv00461
Defendant:
Victoria Sarzant , Dennis Zawilla , Shane Gerber and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Pulera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. County of Cook, Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv03148
Plaintiff:
Dwayne L. Washington
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois , Thomas J. Dart , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chester v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv01781
Plaintiff:
Preston Chester
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe #2 and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sherrod et al
as 3:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jordan
Defendant:
C. Sherrod, John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2014cv02024
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Siliunas et al
as 2:2014cv01408
Defendant:
Mindas V Siliunas, Larry Sprung, A. Khaze and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd N Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark J. Neiweem v. Officer Carter et al
as 1:2014cv06116
Defendant:
Officer Carter, Officer Carol, Officer Hodgeman and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Neiweem
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
