Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gintner, Lori v. O'Neill, Suzanne et al
as 3:2021cv00755
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Gintner
Defendant:
Suzanne C. O'Neill, Michael K. Moran, Gregory J. Strasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. HOLCOMB
as 1:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE CANNON
Defendant:
HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS et al v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MARTINSVILLE CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, AVON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and others
Defendant:
TAMMY MEYER, TODD ROKITA and KATIE JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWS v. WOODLAND, et al
as 1:2021cv01110
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SUZANNE WOODLAND and CITY/TOWN OF CUMBERLAND
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LAWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cannon Bey et al v. The State of Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv00480
Defendant:
Robert Dyckman, Oak Park, IL Police Department, D Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher H Cannon Bey, Travis Austin Bey and Damien Holman Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
