Cases 71 - 80 of 125
Jackson v. Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv01930
Plaintiff:
Carl E Jackson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Anthony Cereceres, James Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hixson et al v. Gottschalk et al
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Janet Pichon Hixson and Richard Hixson
Defendant:
Stephanie Gottschalk, Margery Justice, Ryan Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Hurlburt et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cook
Defendant:
Jacob Hurlburt , John Doe 1-10 and City of Marion, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. HURLBURT et al
as 1:2016cv03073
Defendant:
CITY OF MARION, INDIANA, JOHN DOE 1-10 and JACOB HURLBURT
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Prison Legal News v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2016cv06862
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News
Defendant:
County of Cook, Illinois , Thomas J Dart , Nneka Jones Tapia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHRODER v. MADISON JUVENILE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 4:2016cv00121
Defendant:
DERRICK BRIGHTWELL, DOES 1-10, TIM GREATHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
LILIAN KARENA SCHRODER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ebler et al v. Lee County et al
as 3:2016cv50167
Plaintiff:
John Ebler and Natalie Ebler
Defendant:
Lee County , City of Dixon and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores et al v. Norwood et al
as 1:2016cv02877
Plaintiff:
Alma C Flores
Defendant:
Felicia F Norwood , Clint Caldwell , State of Illinois Department of Healthcare and family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
