Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mendoza v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Madeline Mendoza
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Reynaldo Guevara, JoAnn Halvorsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MENDOZA v. BROWN
as 1:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
CHELLARISE MENDOZA
Defendant:
KARL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angela Pierce v. Calumet County, Wisconsin, et al
as 23-1280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
CALUMET COUNTY, WISCONSIN, BRETT J. BOWE, JULIE HOERNING and others
Sillah, Abdoul v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2023cv00096
Not Yet Classified:
Abdoul Malick Sillah
Defendant:
City of Madison, Dane County, John Bauman and others
Interested Party:
State Of Wisconsin Department Of Health & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newbery v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06403
Plaintiff:
Jorge Newbery and Susana A. Mendoza
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
