Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Delaney v. Pennel et al
as 3:2024cv03228
Defendant:
Altria, Shannon Pennell, Randy Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis W Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnston v. Swaminathan et al
as 1:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnson and Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Swaminathan, Shay and Watson-Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gintner, Lori v. O'Neill, Suzanne et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Gintner
Defendant:
Suzanne C. O'Neill, Michael K. Moran, Gregory J. Strasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. City of Portage et al
as 2:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
James E Snyder
Defendant:
City of Portage, Schmidt, Whitten & Whitten LLC, Daniel Whitten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gill v. Hammond The City of et al
as 2:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Mark A Gill
Defendant:
Hammond The City of, Thomas M McDermott Jr, The Hammond Police Dpt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohamed Emad v. Dodge County, et al
as 22-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED SALAH MOHAMED A EMAD
Defendant / Appellee:
DODGE COUNTY, DALE J. SCHMIDT, ANTHONY BRUGGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
