Cases 1 - 10 of 1,425
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Connolly v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Noreen Connolly
Defendant:
Courtney C Smith and Todd Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Divelbiss, Randin v. Wollin, Sam et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Chief Sam Wollin, Officer Smith and Adams Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gold-Smith v. Will County et al
as 1:2024cv03856
Plaintiff:
Robert Gold-Smith
Defendant:
Will County, Joseph Grozik, Policandriotis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Harvey et al
as 1:2024cv03611
Plaintiff:
Marque Smith
Defendant:
City of Harvey, G. Thomas, L. Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jalam Smith v. Lutheran University Association Inc.
as 24-1710
Plaintiff:
JALAM V. SMITH
Defendant:
LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
