Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
WEAVER v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv01633
Defendant:
DAWN JOHNSON and TONY SKINNER
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNNELL et al v. CITY OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2023cv02113
Plaintiff:
malcolm bunnell and caitlin white
Defendant:
CITY OF FISHERS, OFFICER ROB THOMPSON, OFFICER shawn wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PAYTON et al v. WALSH et al
as 1:2021cv02817
Plaintiff:
JULIA REAGAN, JOSHUA FREDERICK, JACQUELINE HUBER and others
Defendant:
MARTIN J. WALSH and ASCENSION ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TYRA v. GOVERNERS OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01940
Defendant:
KIM HORN, DAVID TYRA, DOVOVEN PATRICK LAMB and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. TYRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
