Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davenell Ash v. Kelly Thimm, et al
as 22-3242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVENELL L. ASH
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY THIMM, Circuit Court Judge, CHAD LALOR, Prosecutor, TODD CARLSON, Officer and others
Davenell Ash v. Superior Police Department, et al
as 22-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVENELL L. ASH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SUPERIOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, KELLY HASHEY, Mr. and KELLY HASHEY, Mrs.
Ash, Davenell v. Thimm, Kelly et al
as 3:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Kelly Thimm, Chad LaLor, Officer Todd Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Mr. Kelly Hashey and Mrs. Kelly Hashey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASH v. ROTHENBERG et al
as 1:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
CASSIUS ASH
Defendant:
MARC ROTHENBERG, CARLISLE, VICKY NEIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASH v. ASH et al
as 1:2021cv02514
Plaintiff:
CASSIUS KAZMERE ASH
Defendant:
DAEVIDA DANIELLE ASH, STATE OF INDIANA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Pulaski City State Patrol
as 3:2021cv00781
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Pulaski City State Patrol, Pulaski County State Patrol, Lisa Casper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
