Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lawrence Lennon, et al v. City of Carmel, Indiana, et al
as 16-3836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE B. LENNON, ROBERT J. SANFORD, CORY R. BURNS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, RICK SHARP, ERIC SEIDENSTICKER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alford v. Pasel et al
as 2:2012cv02046
Petitioner:
Cory R Alford
Defendant:
Ray Pasel , Kris Lombardi , Zachary Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2011cv01727
Defendant:
BRAD ALFORD, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JONATHAN M. LAWLIS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE E. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MURPHY v. ALFORD et al
as 1:2011cv01660
Defendant:
OFFICER BRAD ALFORD and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Pasel et al
as 1:2011cv08325
Plaintiff:
Cory R Alford
Defendant:
Ray Pasel, Kris Lombardi, Zachary Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donna Vogt v. Raymond James Financial, Inco, et al
as 11-2573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. VOGT
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED, RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, EMMANUAL MAMALAKIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vogt v. Raymond James Financial Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00777
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Vogt
Defendant:
Raymond James Financial Inc, Raymond James Financial Services Inc, Thomas James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
