Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GREEN et al v. JENSEN et al
as 1:2019cv02880
Defendant:
VALERIE KINCY, MARY THILMAN, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
A. H., Z. D. and CARMEN GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James et al v. Lydon et al
as 1:2019cv03366
Plaintiff:
Arlinda L Johns, Monica Josey James and Tray JOHNS
Defendant:
TANYA NGUYEN, KATIE OMBERG, REED MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Tate et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07439
Defendant:
Jennifer Burmistrz, James D. Cascone, Michael Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Legend Booth, E'Monie Booth, Ebony Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Open Communities v. Atlantic Realty Partners et al
as 1:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
Open Communities
Defendant:
Atlantic Realty Partners, Focus Development, Inc. and Booth Hansen, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boothe v. Sherman et al
as 1:2013cv07228
Plaintiff:
Patrice Boothe
Defendant:
Village of Wheeling, The, Township High School District 214, Unknown District 214 Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00117
Defendant:
ROGER BOOTH, PAUL BOWLING, MITCH DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
PAULI COFFEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Place v. City Of Waukegan et al
as 1:2011cv08416
Plaintiff:
Linda Place
Defendant:
City Of Waukegan, Al J Booth, David Marion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
