Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bray v. Group 2029, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Taylor Bray
Defendant:
Group 2029, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kauther v. Salger et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kauther
Defendant:
Blake Salger, Benjamin David Demond, Brad Bray-Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-1849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
TRUONG v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01750
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, RODRIC BRAY, TODD HUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Shiparski et al
as 3:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant:
OFFICER Kyle Shiparski, OFFICER WILLIE HENDERSON, OFFICER Adam Brinkman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Galen A. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADAMS et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant:
MARK MILLER, GREG SHELINE, TYLER O. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
