Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pittman v. Halloran et al
as 1:2023cv14786
Plaintiff:
Marcelous Pittman
Defendant:
John Halloran, James O'Brien, Michael Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yeager v. Office of the State Appellate Defender et al
as 3:2021cv00245
Defendant:
James K Donovan, Michelle Sanders, Office of the State Appellate Defender and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Yeager, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulton v. Bartik et al
as 1:2020cv03118
Plaintiff:
John Fulton
Defendant:
Joseph Struck, Robert Girardi, Michael Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Bartik et al
as 1:2020cv03119
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, Joseph Struck, Robert Girardi and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.
as 1:2013cv07419
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Allen , Mark F Breen and Paul G Olson
Defendant:
Jewel Food Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sharon Bogan v. City of Chicago, et al
as 10-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON BOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, S. JASICA, Sergeant, MATTHEW BREEN and others
Diadenko et al
as 1:2010cv02723
Plaintiff:
Elena Diadenko , Sally Chiodo , David Temkin and others
Defendant:
Mary Ann Folino, Ron Huberman and Chicago Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2008cv01465
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. MITCHELL
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, INDIANA STATE PRISON, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
