Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hobbs v. Bauch et al
as 1:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant:
Reva S Bauch, Charles R Vaith, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Crawford v. Norgle
as 1:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crawford
Defendant:
Charles R Norgle, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haeuser v. Village of Caledonia et al
as 2:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Charles R Haeuser
Defendant:
Village of Caledonia, City of Racine, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haeuser v. LEE Enterprises
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
Charles R Haeuser
Defendant:
LEE Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs, III v. Portage Indiana City of et al
as 2:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Gibbs, III
Defendant:
Richard Schmitt , Roger Peele and Portage Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becker v. RPS/Aureco
as 1:2012cv08568
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Becker
Defendant:
RPS/Aureco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gerald Guice, Jr. v. Charles Winkler, et al
as 12-2750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD ACE GUICE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. WINKLER, Honorable Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois County Department Law, STEPHEN L. SCHAR, D'ANCONA & PFLAUM and others
Littlejohn v. Wolle et al
as 1:2012cv05009
Plaintiff:
Darren Littlejohn
Defendant:
Charles R Wolle and Scott Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guice v. Winkler et al
as 3:2012cv50175
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ace Guice, Jr
Defendant:
Charles R. Winkler, Stephen L. Schar, D'Ancona & Pflaum LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF JAMES BOWMAN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00869
Defendant:
DR. ELTON AMOS, M.D., DR. RICHARD M. CARR, M.D., CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JAMES BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
