Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Pangea Ventures LLC v. Farmer
as 1:2023cv15401
Plaintiff:
Pangea Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Kevin Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kevin Farmer v. Pangea Ventures LLC, et al
as 23-2885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
PANGEA VENTURES LLC and BLUHM LEGAL CLINIC OF NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Farmer v. Pangea Ventures LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05870
Plaintiff:
Kevin Farmer
Defendant:
Pangea Ventures LLC and Bluhm Legal Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Koen v. Southern Seven Health Department
as 3:2023cv02657
Plaintiff:
Robbie Koen, Robbie M Koen, Jontae Nelson and others
Defendant:
Southern Seven Health Department, Rhonda Ray, Terry Heisner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Farmer et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Walter Garron and Darryl Farmer
Petitioner:
Daryl Farmer
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Cavalier Johnson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
