Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Cowles v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Cowles, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Indiana State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GRUBB v. MEADE et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY GRUBB
Defendant:
JEFREY MEADE, TANNER HURLEY and ISP TROOPER 9448
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurley v. Varian Medical Systmes
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
David Hurley
Defendant:
Varian Medical Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alli v. Leda et al
as 3:2022cv01048
Plaintiff:
Dartanin Alli and Dartanin Ali
Defendant:
Hanna Leda, H Leda, M Cavurro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craft et al v. Hurley et al
as 3:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
William A Craft, William Craft and Darcel Birton
Defendant:
Elizebeth Hurley, John M Marnocha and Brisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troogstad et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv05600
Plaintiff:
Scott Troogstad, Marcus Harris, Gary Duszak and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jay Pritzker and Jay Robert Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creamer v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv07052
Defendant:
E. REYES #21224, J. JOHNSON #8265, M. HURLEY #20491 and others
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL CREAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
