Cases 1 - 10 of 1,132
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weekly v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04752
Plaintiff:
London Weekly
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willie Bounds v. Kirsten Johnson, et al
as 24-1973
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. BOUNDS
Defendant:
KIRSTEN JOHNSON, RANDY JONES and ZACK HENDERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2024cv04128
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Robert Wes Wheeler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BENSON et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
LEON BENSON and KOLLEEN BUNCH
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ALAN F. JONES, LESLIE VANBUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
