Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Derksen v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Roy Charles Derksen
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Fond du Lac County, Tony Evers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDIN v. BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
PAULETTE HARDIN
Defendant:
BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPT., CHIEF MICHAEL DIEKHOFF, DET. JEFFREY ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jane Doe 1, et al v. Attorney General of Indiana, et al
as 22-2748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 3, WILLIAM MUDD MARTIN HASKELL, M.D. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD ROKITA, Attorney General of Indiana, KRISTINA BOX, Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, INDIANA STATE BOARD OF NURSING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
