Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Kevin Brooks v. Josh Richardson, et al
as 24-1651
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BROOKS
Defendant:
JOSH RICHARDSON, BRYANT MCGEE, LESLEE D. BROOKS and others
Wolff, Ronald et al v. Kaul, Josh et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Wolff, Jr. and Karri E. Wolff
Defendant:
Josh Kaul and Dennis Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. Johnston et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Steven E Johnston, Kelsey D Johnston, Kendall Gosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Village of Glen Carbon et al
as 3:2023cv03977
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rodgers
Defendant:
Village of Glen Carbon, Justin Click, Gerard Spratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wayde Coleman v. Josh Peters, et al
as 23-3353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYDE COLEMAN and WAYDE M. COLEMAN, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH A. PETERS, CINDY PALMER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Marion County and others
CHAMBERS v. HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy Derksen v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 23-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY C. DERKSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, FOND DU LAC COUNTY, WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS and others
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
