Cases 1 - 10 of 27
DAVIS v. DOAN et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J DAVIS
Defendant:
CALVIN DOAN, SHAWN KEEN and TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATERMAN v. KEEN et al
as 2:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
CRAIG WATERMAN
Defendant:
CHIEF SHAWN KEEN, SERGEANT JUSTIN SEARS, OFFICER ALAN JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN PARKER
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWN KEEN, LANCE SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.D. v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00427
Defendant:
AUSTIN BARRON, VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JOHN PLASSE and others
Plaintiff:
D. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2020cv00140
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
KEEN, CHIEF OF POLICE and CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et al
as 1:2019cv01241
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN L KEEN and CHRISTIAN L. KEEN
Defendant:
MALACHI WEST, DOUGLAS SWAILS, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, acting by and through its Metropolitan Police Department; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MORALES v. CARTER et al
as 2:2019cv00221
Defendant:
THOR MILLER, GWENDOLYN HORTH, CHARLES MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON E. MORALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schenke v. Phelps et al
as 4:2018cv00087
Defendant:
Matt Rosenbarger, Adam Ferguson, David Lord and others
Plaintiff:
James K Schenke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
