Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Menifield et al v. City of Appleton et al
as 1:2020cv01788
Plaintiff:
Jyquasia Menifield, Johneshia Menifield, Joseph Menifield and others
Defendant:
Scott Johnny, Todd L Thomas, City of Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jason L Thomas
Defendant:
Officer Alvin Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kingdom Kuts et al v. Evers et al
as 1:2020cv00723
Defendant:
Todd L Thomas, Andrea Palm and Anthony Steven Evers
Plaintiff:
Kingdom Kuts and Jessica Netzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sievert, Charles et al v. Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center et al
as 3:2013cv00737
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Sievert, Anthony L. Thomas and And John Doe Patients et. al.
Defendant:
Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center , Deb McCoulloch, Amber Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMAS v. JUDGE LARRY MCKINNEY et al
as 3:2011cv00086
Defendant:
SUSAN DOMINGER, JUDGE LARRY MCKINNEY, JUDGE WILLIAM HUSSMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DEBRA L. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv06705
Plaintiff:
Camille L. Thomas
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Dept. of Fleet Management and Dan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
