Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Forte v. Rutkowski et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jennipher Renee Forte
Defendant:
Erik Rutkowski, Jason Cuchowicz, Barbara Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. Schiller et al
as 3:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Teah Mays
Defendant:
Luke Schiller, Ryan Schiller and Melissa Schiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Pioneer Medical Group, LTD et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Carlos N Johnson
Defendant:
Pioneer Medical Group, LTD, Miranda May Kinsinger, Joanna Dobrosz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Motykie et al v. Motykie, et al
as 1:2023cv01779
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Motykie, Katherine D Torbick, MINOR JJ TT and others
Defendant:
Motykie Gary, Village of Inverness, Joseph G Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. Exeter
as 2:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jamar Mays and Timothy Mays
Defendant:
Exeter Finance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. State Farm
as 2:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jamar Mays and Timothy Mays
Defendant:
State Farm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake v. Beth et al
as 2:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Justin Blake
Defendant:
David Beth, Kenosha County of Wisconsin, Kyle Bissonnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. T-Mobile et al
as 2:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jamar Mays
Defendant:
T-Mobile and Peter O Sualdik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
