Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
JOHNSON et al v. AULT et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
TERRY JOHNSON and AUTUMN BREEZE JOHNSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW AULT, SHAWNA AULT, CITY OF VINCENNES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gladney v. Parkview Terrace et al
as 3:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Troyron Davis Gladney
Defendant:
Parkview Terrace, Naomi, Shawna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System et al
as 2:2019cv01348
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, Abigail Sylvia, Andrew Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schenke v. Ward et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Defendant:
Shawna Yoder, Zach Willard, Kelly Ward and others
Plaintiff:
James K Schenke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson Edwards, et al v. Michael Jolliff-Blake, et al
as 17-1848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON D. EDWARDS, SHERRI I. EDWARDS, SHAWNA F. EDWARDS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOLLIFF-BLAKE, CITY OF CHICAGO, ARTURO V. BRACHO and others
Lozano et al v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 2:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lozano, Jr. , BL , OL and others
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Child Services , Terrance K Ciboch , Kathryn Deardoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
