Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Sanders v. Major Hospital
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Susan Sanders
Defendant:
Major Hospital doing business as Harbor Health & Rehab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SOWDERS v. BYRNE et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
BARRY JUNIOR SANDERS and BARRY JUNIOR SOWDERS
Defendant:
ANDY BURNE, MIKE ISOM, KELLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Johnson et al v. Tucek et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Shanterrica Johnson and Shanquil Lashay Bey
Defendant:
David Tucek, Jr, Brad T Caddock, Corey P Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tubbs v. Schnell
as 2:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Shyanne Tubbs
Defendant:
Asia Leech, Mark Sanders, Peter O Bockhorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Anthony Lietzow v. Village of Huntley, Illinois, et al
as 23-1933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY LIETZOW
Defendant / Appellee:
VILLAGE OF HUNTLEY, ILLINOIS, JAMES DALEY, Officer, ALEX PANVINO, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
