Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DHANI v. HAMILTON COUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Defendant:
MARK E HEIRBRANDT, STEVEN C. DILLINGER, KENTON C. WARD and others
Plaintiff:
HARVINDER SINGH DHANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dhani v. Hamilton County Drainage Board
as 1:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Harvinder Singh Dhani
Defendant:
Hamilton County Drainage Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
SINGH v. COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01077
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. SINGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SINGH et al v. INDIANA STATE EXCISE POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
LAKHWANT SINGH, KAMALJIT KAUR, LAKHWINDER SINGH and others
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE EXCISE POLICE, ALAN WOMBOLT, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. OSS et al
as 1:2021cv01867
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PHILLIP SINGH
Defendant:
BETHANY J. BECKMAN, LYN M. SWANSON, A. BRINKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02413
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SINGH v. INDIANA STATE POLICE, ET AL
as 1:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
SUKHWINDER SINGH
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE and TIMOTHY JAMES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
