Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Augusta v. Karlin et al
as 4:2023cv04235
Plaintiff:
Quennel T Augusta
Defendant:
Jeremy Karlin, James Standard, Andrew Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Vancil, Jr. et al
as 4:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Brown and Brenda Joy Brown
Defendant:
David L Vancil, Jr., Heidi A Benson, William E. Poncin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feiza v. Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board et al
as 1:2023cv01905
Plaintiff:
Aaron Feiza
Defendant:
Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board, Keith Calloway, Sean Smoot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wilkinson v. McLaughry et al
as 1:2021cv01317
Plaintiff:
Carrie Ann Wilkinson
Defendant:
Ethan McLaughry, City of Lewistown, Joshua Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv03228
Defendant:
Oglesby, Orquiz Rios, City of Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lajuane Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sklarsky et al v. Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03680
Plaintiff:
Natalie Kenvin, Susan Cook and Laura Sklarsky
Defendant:
Standard Maple Owner, LLC, Apartment Management Consultants, LLC and Indigo Real Estate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shabani, Khaled v. City of Madison et al
as 3:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Michael C. Koval, Madison Police Department, Hamp Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Khaled Shabani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
