Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
PIERSON v. BALDWIN et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
BYRON PIERSON
Defendant:
JEFFERY BALDWIN, M KENDRA KLUMP, JAMES P. HANLON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WEBB v. HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2020cv03286
Plaintiff:
ROMELLO WEBB
Defendant:
CHARLES TYREE and HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONDS v. RISING STAR CASINO RESORT. et al
as 4:2019cv00151
Defendant:
FULL HOUSE RESORTS, BEN DOUGLASS, ANGI TRUEBNER-WEBB and others
Plaintiff:
TODD BONDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCINTOSH v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2017cv04749
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT., MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and ROBERT WEBB
Plaintiff:
CARLTON EVAN MCINTOSH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03911
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cline v. Double Tree Hilton's Management et al
as 3:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Shawn Anthony Cline
Defendant:
Double Tree Hilton's Management and Robert Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIGUEROA v. SPEARS et al
as 1:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE ANN FIGUEROA
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT., MARK SPEARS and JEFF WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
