Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alfred Clayborne, et al v. Michael Brown, et al
as 23-1730
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALFRED CLAYBORNE and ANDREA ERLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL BROWN, Individually and in his official capacity as a detective for the City of Springfield, Illinois Police Department, RYAN MADDOX, Individually and in his official capacity as a detective for the City of Springfield, Illinois Police Department and CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS
Clayborne et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2020cv03145
Defendant:
Jarod Maddox, City of Springfield, Illinois, Mike Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Clayborne and Andrea Erley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02920
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Spivey v. Maddox et al
as 3:2018cv03229
Defendant:
Mary J Curry and J Maddox
Plaintiff:
Owen Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Stewart v. Warnisher et al
as 3:2015cv03057
Plaintiff:
Yvonkia Stewart
Defendant:
Chance Warnisher, Amy L Maddox, Springfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. MIZE et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Defendant:
DAVID BARR, LT BROOKS, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
